Forecasting Financial Risk with Intelligent System Architectures
Keywords:
Financial Risk Management, Predictive Modeling Architectures, Transaction and Operational Risk Signals, Multi-Institution Model Training, Data-Sparse Risk Coverage, AI Governance and Control Frameworks, Self-Retraining ML Systems, Compliance-Aware AI, End-to-End Modeling Pipelines, Modular ML Architectures, Decision-Support Dashboards, Interactive Risk Analytics, Organizational Intent Alignment, Model Delivery Services, Federated Risk Modeling, Enterprise Model Governance, Automated Risk Detection, Business Process Machine Learning, Oversight for AI Innovation, Scalable Risk Analytics.Abstract
Risk management governs strategic and operational decision-making in financial institutions to mitigate threats, avoid violations and avert adverse market and reputational reactions. Predictive modeling architectures are vital for automating the generation of risk signals from transaction and operational data across relevant time horizons. Models jointly trained across multiple institutions extend coverage into data-sparse regions for risk management, detection and mitigation across a wider spectrum. With emerging AI-based systems capable of self-retraining, governance and control frameworks are required to institutionalize appropriate oversight and balance compliance against innovation.
Machine learning is increasingly applied to business process with limited scrutiny. In finance, risk signals governing operations and strategic decision-making must continue to be generated under rigorous governance. Appropriate architectures integrating organizational intent, data-processing and model-delivery capabilities are key enablers. First, an end-to-end modeling pipeline is described. Interactive dashboards or decision-support tools provide direct model access to non-specialist users. A modular architecture supporting independent development, exploration and deployment of models and services for consumption is essential for optimal execution: services may be combined during use for convenience or performance.
References
1. Alessi, L., & Savona, R. (2021). Machine learning for financial stability. In M. D. C. A. et al. (Eds.), Data science for economics and finance (pp. 65–87). Springer.
2. Alonso Robisco, A., & Carbó Martínez, J. M. (2022). Measuring the model risk-adjusted performance of machine learning algorithms in credit default prediction. Financial Innovation, 8, 70.
3. Loganathan, R. (2021). Integrated Risk and Compliance Frameworks for Global Data Center Operations: A Governance-Centric Approach. Universal Journal of Computer Sciences and Communications, 1(1), 1-26.
4. Chen, Y., Guo, J., Huang, J., & Lin, B. (2022). A novel method for financial distress prediction based on sparse neural networks with L1/2 regularization. International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 13, 2089–2103.
5. Chu, H. (2021). An empirical analysis of corporate financial management risk prediction based on associative memory neural network. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2021, Article 4383742.
6. Elhoseny, M., Metawa, N., Hassan, M. K., & others. (2022). Deep learning-based model for financial distress prediction. Annals of Operations Research.
7. Frezza, M., Bianchi, S., & Pianese, A. (2022). Forecasting Value-at-Risk in turbulent stock markets via the local regularity of the price process. Computational Management Science, 19, 99–132.
8. Ge, W., Lalbakhsh, P., Isai, L., Lenskiy, A., & Suominen, H. (2022). Neural network-based financial volatility forecasting: A systematic review. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(1), Article 14, 1–30.
9. Mattaparthi, R. (2021). Unified Data Lineage and Quality Governance Framework for Multi-Source Sensor Streams in Heavy-Duty Powertrain Manufacturing. Online Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 1(1), 1-15.
10. Hacibedel, B., & Qu, R. (2022). Understanding and predicting systemic corporate distress: A machine-learning approach. IMF Working Papers, 2022(153).
11. Huang, B., & Wei, J. (2021). Research on deep learning-based financial risk prediction. Scientific Programming, 2021, Article 6913427.
12. Kakade, K., Jain, I., & Mishra, A. K. (2022). Value-at-Risk forecasting: A hybrid ensemble learning GARCH-LSTM based approach. Resources Policy, 78, 102903.
13. Keilbar, G., & Wang, W. (2022). Modelling systemic risk using neural network quantile regression. Empirical Economics, 62, 93–118.
14. Liu, L., Chen, C., & Wang, B. (2022). Predicting financial crises with machine learning methods. Journal of Forecasting.
15. Peddi, R. K. (2021). Optimizing Case Management Workflows in Global Data Center Colocation Services. Universal Journal of Computer Sciences and Communications, 1(1), 1-21.
16. Liu, R., & Pun, C. S. (2022). Machine-learning-enhanced systemic risk measure: A two-step supervised learning approach. Journal of Banking & Finance, 136, 106416.
17. Ma, Y., Liu, H., & Zhai, G. (2021). Financial risk early warning based on wireless network communication and the optimal fuzzy SVM artificial intelligence model. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2021, Article 7819011.
18. Ouyang, Z.-S., Yang, X.-T., & Lai, Y.-Z. (2021). Systemic financial risk early warning of financial market in China using Attention-LSTM model. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 56, 101383.
19. Petrozziello, A., Troiano, L., Serra, A., Jordanov, I., Storti, G., Tagliaferri, R., & La Rocca, M. (2022). Deep learning for volatility forecasting in asset management. Soft Computing, 26, 8553–8574.
20. Pham, X. T. T., & Ho, T. H. (2021). Using boosting algorithms to predict bank failure: An untold story. International Review of Economics & Finance, 76, 40–54.
21. Sen, S., & Almeida de Figueiredo, S. (2021). Predicting bank failures with machine learning algorithms: A comparison of boosting and cost-sensitive models. Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting Studies, 3(2).
22. Shi, S., Tse, R., Luo, W., D’Addona, S., & Pau, G. (2022). Machine learning-driven credit risk: A systemic review. Neural Computing and Applications, 34, 14327–14339.
23. Wasserbacher, H., & Spindler, M. (2022). Machine learning for financial forecasting, planning and analysis: Recent developments and pitfalls. Digital Finance, 4, 63–88.
24. Wang, M. (2022). Forecasting value at risk and expected shortfall using high-frequency data of domestic and international stock markets. Journal of Forecasting, 41(8), 1595–1607.
25. Reddy, V. A. R. (2021). Challenges in Standardizing Member Eligibility Data Across Multi-Payer Healthcare Ecosystems. International Journal of Medical Toxicology and Legal Medicine, 24(3), 1-19.
26. Wen, C., Yang, J., Gan, L., & Pan, Y. (2021). Big data driven Internet of Things for credit evaluation and early warning in finance. Future Generation Computer Systems, 124, 295–307.
27. Zhang, C.-X., Li, J., Huang, X.-F., Zhang, J.-S., & Huang, H.-C. (2022). Forecasting stock volatility and value-at-risk based on temporal convolutional networks. Expert Systems with Applications, 207, 117951.
28. Zhang, J., & Chen, L. (2022). Application of neural network with autocorrelation in long-term forecasting of systemic financial risk. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022, Article 7131143.
29. Arian, H., Moghimi, M., Tabatabaei, E., & Zamani, S. (2022). Encoded Value-at-Risk: A machine learning approach for portfolio risk measurement. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 202, 500–525.
Additional Files
Published
Data Availability Statement
None
