Event-Driven AI for Real-Time Sanctions Screening

Authors

  • Dhanaraj Sathiri Author

Keywords:

Sanctions compliance, regulatory technologies, event-driven architecture, AI architecture design, machine learning governance, cloud-native platforms, cloud-native compliance solutions, data inspection, privacy, and sensitivity management, observability and monitoring, streaming data processing, model production, operation, and supervision, rule management, risk-based thresholds, and human oversight.

Abstract

A crucial task in financial crime compliance is sanctions screening, which involves determining whether organizations or individuals should be restricted from engaging in business relationships with a financial institution or the institution’s customers. The evolving geopolitical landscape has led to increasingly extensive and dynamic sanctions lists. Regulatory scrutiny on the adequacy of screening controls has heightened, with realtime detection of potential matches emerging as the next frontier for more forward-thinking institutions. A monitoring-based industry guidance paper jointly published by the Basel Committee and Financial Action Task Force calls for greater use of artificial intelligence in sanctions compliance.

Despite this opportunity, a current shortcoming is that matching against sanctions lists continues to be predominantly based on batch processing, involving either screening transactions against sanctions list prior to pass through the bank, or screening customers’ information against sanctions list prior to onboarding or at defined refresh frequency. Suitable event-driven architectural patterns and cloud-native platforms can help financial institutions close this gap.

References

1. Kim, S., & Yang, S. (2024). Accuracy improvement in financial sanction screening: Is natural language processing the solution? Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1374323.

2. Turksen, U., Benson, V., & Adamyk, B. (2024). Legal implications of automated suspicious transaction monitoring: Enhancing integrity of AI. Journal of Banking Regulation, 25(4), 359–377.

3. ThankGod, J. (2024). Harnessing artificial intelligence (AI) for comprehensive monitoring and enforcement of international trade sanctions and embargoes. SSRN Electronic Journal.

4. Pakina, A., & Pujari, M. (2024). Neuro-symbolic compliance architectures: Real-time detection of evolving financial crimes using hybrid AI. International Journal of Science and Technology, 3(2828–7045), 56–66.

5. Nagubandi, A. R. (2024). Breakthrough real-time AI-driven regulatory intelligence for multi-counterparty derivatives and collateral platforms: Autonomous compliance for IFRS, EMIR, NAIC, SOX and emerging regulations. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 9(4).

6. Shahsavari, M., Hussain, O. K., Saberi, M., & Sharma, P. (2024). Event identification for supply chain risk management through news analysis by using large language models. The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, 18(2), 255–278.

7. Abhireddy, N. (2024). AI-driven cloud data orchestration for real-time enterprise decision intelligence systems. International Journal of Research and Applied Innovations, 7(6).

8. Sousa e Silva, N. (2024). The Artificial Intelligence Act: Critical overview. arXiv Preprint arXiv:2409.00264.

9. Kim, S., & Yang, S. (2024). Natural language processing-enhanced sanctions screening for reducing false positives in financial compliance operations. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1374323.

10. Turksen, U., Benson, V., & Adamyk, B. (2024). AI governance and accountability in automated financial crime monitoring systems. Journal of Banking Regulation, 25(4), 359–377.

11. ThankGod, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence applications for sanctions enforcement and international trade compliance. SSRN Electronic Journal.

12. Pakina, A., & Pujari, M. (2024). Hybrid AI architectures for adaptive compliance monitoring in cross-border financial transactions. International Journal of Science and Technology, 3(2828–7045), 56–66.

13. Nagubandi, A. R. (2024). Autonomous compliance systems using real-time AI-driven regulatory intelligence. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 9(4).

14. Shahsavari, M., Hussain, O. K., Saberi, M., & Sharma, P. (2024). Large language models for event-driven intelligence and risk detection in dynamic environments. The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, 18(2), 255–278.

15. Abhireddy, N. (2024). Event-driven cloud orchestration and AI analytics for real-time decision intelligence. International Journal of Research and Applied Innovations, 7(6).

16. Kim, S., & Yang, S. (2024). AI-based text similarity techniques for sanctions list matching and compliance screening. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, 1374323.

17. Turksen, U., Benson, V., & Adamyk, B. (2024). Regulatory and legal considerations for AI-enabled financial monitoring platforms. Journal of Banking Regulation, 25(4), 359–377.

18. ThankGod, J. (2024). Machine learning approaches for monitoring international sanctions and embargo compliance. SSRN Electronic Journal.

19. Pakina, A., & Pujari, M. (2024). Real-time financial crime detection using graph-based and rule-based AI compliance frameworks. International Journal of Science and Technology, 3(2828–7045), 56–66.

20. Nagubandi, A. R. (2024). Regulatory automation and AI-enabled compliance intelligence for financial ecosystems. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 9(4).*

Additional Files

Published

2024-06-22

Data Availability Statement

None

How to Cite

Event-Driven AI for Real-Time Sanctions Screening. (2024). European Data Science Journal (EDSJ), 2(02). https://esa-research.org/index.php/EDSJ/article/view/7

Similar Articles

1-10 of 22

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.