Adaptive Agentic AI for Cloud-Native Fraud Detection in InsurTech
Keywords:
Agentic Artificial Intelligence, InsurTech Fraud Detection, Cloud-Native Fraud Platforms, Intelligent Agent Design, Hybrid AI Architectures, Pandemic-Driven Fraud Risk, Privacy-Preserving AI Systems, Risk-Aware Decision Frameworks, Financial Crime Prevention, Autonomous Fraud Mitigation, Multi-Stakeholder Fraud Ecosystems, Cloud-Based Analytics, Continuous Integration And Delivery Pipelines, Model And Data Governance, Responsible AI Systems, Scalable Fraud Analytics, Real-Time Fraud Prevention, Secure Financial Platforms, AI-Driven Risk Escalation, Lifecycle-Aware Fraud Management.Abstract
The pandemic-induced surge in encompass an explosion of opportunities for fraud and thus the need for improved fraud-detection analytics. When external stakeholders such as financial service providers and law enforcement agencies are involved, fraud detection and prevention systems must go beyond detection alone. Agentic AI enables an improved intelligent-agent-centered design for InsurTech and provides a framework for decisions involving an increase in risk. The hybridization of agentic AI with cloud-native concepts further extends the design pattern to fraud-detection platforms developed on cloud services. Emerging specifications of the fraud detection domain call for agentic systems that take such factors into consideration. While theory enables advances in design and artifact construction, novel system designs clarify operation and integration within the broader operation of an InsurTech system. Together they offer a foundation for future real-world implementations of agentic concepts that can deliver business value.
Research avenues covering core themes facing agents and cloud-based design pattern components guide practical implementation and further development of the proposed concepts, including pioneering cloud-based fraud detection for InsurTech executives. Reactions, responsibility, evolution, and privacy concern the decision space of agent-based privacy-preserving systems, and linked supporting factor rails define considerations inherent in managing the design and construction of high-quality aged liquor. Patterns facilitate cloud-based fraud-detection platforms capable of managing application, data, and model service risk transparently and efficiently throughout their operating life cycle. The specification of continuous integration and delivery pipelines serves as a guide for constructing fraud models and related assets.
References
1. Aslam, F., Hunjra, A. I., Ftiti, Z., Louhichi, W., & Shams, T. (2022). Insurance fraud detection: Evidence from artificial intelligence and machine learning. Research in International Business and Finance, 62, 101744.
2. Farbmacher, H., Löw, L., & Spindler, M. (2022). An explainable attention network for fraud detection in claims management. Journal of Econometrics, 228(2), 244–258.
3. Gottimukkala, V. R. R. (2020). Energy-Efficient Design Patterns for Large-Scale Banking Applications Deployed on AWS Cloud. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer and Communication Engineering (IJARCCE), DOI, 10.
4. Severino, M. K., & Peng, Y. (2021). Machine learning algorithms for fraud prediction in property insurance: Empirical evidence using real-world microdata. Machine Learning with Applications, 5, 100074.
5. Gomes, C., Jin, Z., & Yang, H. (2021). Insurance fraud detection with unsupervised deep learning. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 88(3), 591–624.
6. Şahin, Ö. E., Ayvaz, S., & Çalımfidan, E. (2020). Comparison of machine learning models for predicting fraudulent claims in the insurance sector. Journal of Information Technologies, 13(4), 479–489.
7. Hilal, W., Gadsden, S. A., & Yawney, J. (2022). Financial fraud: A review of anomaly detection techniques and recent advances. Expert Systems with Applications, 193, 116429.
8. Al-Hashedi, K. G., & Magalingam, P. (2021). Financial fraud detection applying data mining techniques: A comprehensive review from 2009 to 2019. Computer Science Review, 40, 100402.
9. Aitha, A. R. (2021). Dev Ops Driven Digital Transformation: Accelerating Innovation In The Insurance Industry. Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research.
10. Zhu, X., Ao, X., Qin, Z., Chang, Y., Liu, Y., He, Q., & Li, J. (2021). Intelligent financial fraud detection practices in post-pandemic era. The Innovation, 2(4), 100176.
11. Liu, Y., Ao, X., Qin, Z., Chi, J., Feng, J., Yang, H., & He, Q. (2021). Pick and choose: A GNN-based imbalanced learning approach for fraud detection. Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021, 3168–3177.
12. Benchaji, I., Douzi, S., El Ouahidi, B., & Jaafari, J. (2021). Enhanced credit card fraud detection based on attention mechanism and LSTM deep model. Journal of Big Data, 8, 151.
13. Cheng, D., Xiang, S., Shang, C., Zhang, Y., Yang, F., & Zhang, L. (2020). Spatio-temporal attention-based neural network for credit card fraud detection. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 34(1), 362–369.
14. Inala, R. (2022). Cross-Domain MDM Integration Using AI-Driven Data Governance: A Case Study In Financial Technology Architecture. Migration Letters, 19(2), 280-304.
15. Craja, P., Kim, A., & Lessmann, S. (2020). Deep learning for detecting financial statement fraud. Decision Support Systems, 139, 113421.
16. Błaszczyński, J., de Almeida Filho, A. T., Matuszyk, A., Szeląg, M., & Słowiński, R. (2021). Auto loan fraud detection using dominance-based rough set approach versus machine learning methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 163, 113740.
17. Eckert, C., & Osterrieder, K. (2020). How digitalization affects insurance companies: Overview and use cases of digital technologies. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft, 109, 333–360.
18. Owens, E., Sheehan, B., Mullins, M., Cunneen, M., Ressel, J., & Castignani, G. (2022). Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in insurance. Risks, 10(12), 230.
19. Butt, U. A., Mehmood, M., Shah, S. B. H., Amin, R., Shaukat, M. W., Raza, S. M., Suh, D. Y., & Piran, M. J. (2020). A review of machine learning algorithms for cloud computing security. Electronics, 9(9), 1379.
20. Inala, R. Designing Scalable Technology Architectures for Customer Data in Group Insurance and Investment Platforms.
21. Shamshirband, S., Fathi, M., Chronopoulos, A. T., Montieri, A., Palumbo, F., & Pescapè, A. (2020). Computational intelligence intrusion detection techniques in mobile cloud computing environments: Review, taxonomy, and open research issues. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 55, 102582.
22. Pölöskei, I. (2021). MLOps approach in the cloud-native data pipeline design. Acta Technica Jaurinensis, 15(1), 1–6.
23. Ruf, P., Madan, M., Reich, C., & Ould-Abdeslam, D. (2021). Demystifying MLOps and presenting a recipe for the selection of open-source tools. Applied Sciences, 11(19), 8861.
24. Liu, Y., Ling, Z., Huo, B., Wang, B., Liu, Y., & others. (2020). Building a platform for machine learning operations from open source frameworks. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 53(5), 704–709.
25. Tamburri, D. A. (2020). Sustainable MLOps—Trends and challenges. In Proceedings of the 2020 22nd International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing (SYNASC 2020) (pp. 17–23). IEEE.
26. Calvaresi, D., Dicente Cid, Y., Marinoni, M., Dragoni, A. F., Najjar, A., & Schumacher, M. (2021). Real-time multi-agent systems: Rationality, formal model, and empirical results. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 35, 12.
27. Segireddy, A. R. (2020). Cloud Migration Strategies for High-Volume Financial Messaging Systems.
28. Gronauer, S., & Diepold, K. (2022). Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning: A survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 55, 895–943.
29. Pesce, E., & Montana, G. (2020). Improving coordination in small-scale multi-agent deep reinforcement learning through memory-driven communication. Machine Learning, 109, 1727–1747.
30. Mao, H., Liu, W., Hao, J., Luo, J., Li, D., Zhang, Z., Wang, J., & Xiao, Z. (2020). Neighborhood cognition consistent multi-agent reinforcement learning. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 34(5), 7219–7226.
